Category Archives: Marryat

All fired up

A high point in Malcolm’s career in elective politics was chairing the committee of the local crematorium.

Mock it not!

Thereby he  ”covered” two hours of an “environmental studies” class, at ten-minutes’ notice, armed only with the journal of the crematoria association.

Over that two-hour session (which significantly contributed to Malcolm’s overtime payments) and allowing for the statutory tea-break, students calculated the effort required to excavate graves six-feet deep, versus the cost of therms charged by still-nationalized British Gas to raise the human cadaver to its burning point (at this distance in time, Malcolm reckons it was then less than 50p a cadaver). Not forgetting, because the two-hours ran slow, an animadversion on the extra cost of incinerating an emaciated advanced-cancer case.

Malcolm’s moment of self-adulation came from the cynical student, leaving the room, muttering “That’s my best class, ever,”

Bleak House

At that time Malcolm’s day-job was to lecture on English Literature, including a course on Dickens.

Captain Frederick Marryat, in Jacob Faithful, killed off his main character’s mother by implying she had spontaneously combusted. After half-a-dozen telling references to “cinders”, we come to this:

A strong, empyreumatic, thick smoke ascended from the hatchway of the cabin, and, as it had now fallen calm, it mounted straight up the air in a dense column. I attempted to go in, but so soon as I encountered the smoke I found that it was impossible; it would have suffocated me in half a minute. I did what most children would have done in such a situation of excitement and distress—I sat down and cried bitterly. In about ten minutes I moved my hands, with which I had covered up my face, and looked at the cabin hatch. The smoke had disappeared, and all was silent. I went to the hatchway, and although the smell was still overpowering, I found that I could bear it. I descended the little ladder of three steps, and called “Mother!” but there was no answer. The lamp fixed against the after bulk-head, with a glass before it, was still alight, and I could see plainly to every corner of the cabin. Nothing was burning—not even the curtains to my mother’s bed appeared to be singed. I was astonished—breathless with fear, with a trembling voice, I again called out “Mother!” I remained more than a minute panting for breath, and then ventured to draw back the curtains of the bed—my mother was not there! but there appeared to be a black mass in the centre of the bed. I put my hand fearfully upon it—it was a sort of unctuous, pitchy cinder. I screamed with horror—my little senses reeled—I staggered from the cabin and fell down on the deck in a state amounting almost to insanity: it was followed by a sort of stupor, which lasted for many hours.

Well, Marryat was simply expanding upon a report in the London Times in that same year of 1832.

In due course (which brings us back on track), by 1852, Dickens was writing Bleak House and needed to off his minor villain, Krook. Krook is found mysteriously burned to death:

“What’s the matter with the cat?” says Mr Guppy: “Look at her!”

“Mad, I think. And no wonder, in this evil place.”

They advance slowly, looking at all these things. The cat remains where they found her, still snarling at the something on the ground, before the fire and between the two chairs. What is it? Hold up the light.

Here is a small burnt patch of flooring; here is the tinder from a little bundle of burnt paper, but not so light as usual, seeming to be steeped in something; and here is — is it the cinder of a small charred and broken log of wood sprinkled with white ashes, or is it coal? O Horror, he IS here! and this, from which we run away, striking out the light and overturning one another into the street, is all that represents him.

Help, help, help! come into this house for Heaven’s sake!

Plenty will come in, but none can help. The Lord Chancellor of that Court, true to his title in his last act, has died the death of all Lord Chancellors in all Courts, and of all authorities in all places under all names soever, where false pretences are made, and where injustice is done. Call the death by any name Your Highness will, attribute it to whom you will, or say it might have been prevented how you will, it is the same death eternally — inborn, inbred, engendered in the corrupted humours of the vicious body itself, and that only — Spontaneous Combustion, and none other of all the deaths that can be died.

A Malcolmian aside:

Compare and contrast —

    • Charles Dickens, 1852: “What’s the matter with the cat?” says Mr Guppy.
    • Arthur Conan Doyle, 1894: ”The dog did nothing in the night-time.” “That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes. 

Dickens, for this piece of literary legerdemain, was the focus of instant criticism. All modern editions contain Dickens’ self-defence:

The possibility of what is called spontaneous combustion has been denied since the death of Mr. Krook; and my good friend Mr. Lewes (quite mistaken, as he soon found, in supposing the thing to have been abandoned by all authorities) published some ingenious letters to me at the time when that event was chronicled, arguing that spontaneous combustion could not possibly be. I have no need to observe that I do not wilfully or negligently mislead my readers and that before I wrote that description I took pains to investigate the subject. There are about thirty cases on record, of which the most famous, that of the Countess Cornelia de Baudi Cesenate, was minutely investigated and described by Giuseppe Bianchini, a prebendary of Verona, otherwise distinguished in letters, who published an account of it at Verona in 1731, which he afterwards republished at Rome. The appearances, beyond all rational doubt, observed in that case are the appearances observed in Mr. Krook’s case. The next most famous instance happened at Rheims six years earlier, and the historian in that case is Le Cat, one of the most renowned surgeons produced by France. The subject was a woman, whose husband was ignorantly convicted of having murdered her; but on solemn appeal to a higher court, he was acquitted because it was shown upon the evidence that she had died the death of which this name of spontaneous combustion is given. I do not think it necessary to add to these notable facts, and that general reference to the authorities which will be found at page 30, vol. ii.,* the recorded opinions and experiences of distinguished medical professors, French, English, and Scotch, in more modern days, contenting myself with observing that I shall not abandon the facts until there shall have been a considerable spontaneous combustion of the testimony on which human occurrences are usually received.

Modern instance

Now we have West Galway coroner Dr Ciaran McLoughlin coping with a similar inexplicable death.

Just before last Christmas, the body of Michael Faherty had been found , totally burned, with damage only to the immediate floor and ceiling.

Malcolm has no opinion on how such things could happen. All he knows is that the human body contains a considerable quantity of sodium. And he has seen how that can burn.

So, on “spontaneous combustion”, like Charles Dickens, he has an open mind.

Especially in regard to Bleak House.

The death of Krook apart, that is a fine novel.

Leave a Comment

Filed under education, gas, Ireland, Literature, London, Marryat, reading

Whose todger on David?

How about that for a headline?

The death of William Boot — sorry, that should read as Bill Deedes — is big in today’s newspapers, and with good reason.

Malcolm will not join in the memorialising of another of those curious Twentieth-Century figures who proved so infinitely adaptable: that would be presumptious, and will be done far better elsewhere. However, he does pause for thought.

Deedes was newspaperman incarnate, but also politician, anecdotalist, soldier, traveller and humanitarian, and much more. It is what Denis Healey, another of the great survivors, would call “hinterland”. Ted Heath could edit the Church Times, be musician, sailor (though the conducting and the ocean-racing apparently owed as much to the need to create a public image as anything) as well as Prime Minister, the “Great Sulk” and artillery officer, all in one lifetime. Healey himself could be an academic (a double First at Oxford, no less), a more-than-competent photographer, a towering political figure, briefly a member of the Communist Party, a leftwing radical in 1945 and later “on the right” of the Labour Party, but also be a beachmaster at the Anzio landings.

That is a meditation to be continued at a later posting, perhaps. But, for now, back to Boot.

There was a book by William Amos, The Originals, An A-Z of Fiction’s Real-life Characters. It went through at least two editions between 1985 and 1990, and is long out-of-print. If Malcolm ever had a copy, it has been “borrowed” or mislaid for many years. It remains a useful and amusing exercise in a demi-monde between academic scholarship, amateur detection and speculation.

Reality into myth, Mister and Ms?

So, who are the real personalities on whom creative artists base their creations?

A.J.Jaeger (who died at 37, Curzon Road, Muswell Hill, on 18 May 1909, aged just 37) was immortalised as Elgar‘s Nimrod.


Gainsborough‘s The Blue Boy was Jonathan Buttall, the son of a ironmonger. Thanks, in part, to the inheritance of the most ruthless of the Californian railroad robber barons, Buttall is condemned to spend the rest of eternity eyeing Sarah Barrett Moulton, a Jamaican plantation heiress, who was also Lawrence‘s Pinkie (and aunt of the more famous, if less recognisable, Mrs Browning).


Victorine Meurent took a naked lunch for Manet, …

… but did Maria del Pilar Teresa Cayetana de Silva Alvarez de Toledo (crazy name, crazy gal) show all for Goya?

Malcolm wonders who was busting out for Delacroix’ Liberty


… while he recognises Alice Prin (“Kiki de Montparnasse”), who looks on life from both sides now, and not just for Man Ray.


Curiouser a
nd curiouser

It is well-known that “Sherlock Holmes” owes a great deal (including hat and cloak) to Conan Doyle’s tutor in surgery, Joseph Bell. Equally, “Robinson Crusoe” had, at least in part, a prior existence in Alexander Selkirk. Even Falstaff was a dubious take on Sir John Oldcastle.

There is a bizarre link between “Biggles” and “Just William“. The model for “Captain” (in reality, never more than a Flying Officer, with some six weeks of combat experience) W.E. Johns‘ character derived from Air Commodore Cecil George Wigglesworth. Meanwhile Richmal Crompton was mudding up her brother, John Lamburn. Lamburn was first with the Rhodesian police, worked in China, and did war service with the RAF in Iceland under … Wigglesworth. In passing, it might usefully be noted that W.E. Johns started his career inspecting the drains in Swaffham, and later rejected T.E.Lawrence as an RAF recruit.

Degrees of separation?

Johns might provide the starting point for a kind of literary goosechase. He would have scrutinised the sanitation outside Oakleigh House, offices of Kingdom and Kingdom. In front of those offices is the town sign showing the Pedlar of Swaffham, carved by the grammar school’s art teacher, and nephew of Howard Carter, the excavator of Tutankhamun, and himself one-time resident of the town. TV’s “Market Shipborough” is a composite of Swaffham, Hunstanton, Thetford (birthplace of Tom Paine) and Wells-next-the-Sea.

It would not need much effort to link from those to Rider Haggard (born at East Bradenham), who would lead on to Indiana Jones or Jurassic Park. Or, in another direction, to Horatio Nelson, just down the road from Wells at Burnham, and one model for C.S. Forester‘s “Horatio Hornblower“: the other is Thomas Cochrane. Cochrane also provided a model for “Jack Aubrey“. One of Cochrane’s midshipmen became Captain Marryat (another Norfolk resident). Marryat, indeed, established the sea-novel as a genre, providing the root for (along with the others already mentioned) Joseph Conrad and Hemingway.

Another road out of Wells and Burnham might take us to “Peter Scott’s Lighthouse” on the Nene Cut. And that is in part inspiration for Paul Gallico‘s The Snow Goose, for which Peter Scott did the original illustrations, using his wife, Elizabeth Jane Howard, as the model for “Fritha”. And Elizabeth Jane Howard’s third husband was Kingsley Amis.

Whose Body?

Along the road we might have thought that was “Fenchurch St Paul”, Dorothy Sayers‘ location for The Nine Tailors, the ninth Peter Wimsey mystery story. What we really saw was Walpole St Peter, or Terrington St Clement, two of England’s finest churches.

The first of those “Peter Wimsey” novels was Whose Body? But who was Wimsey? Was it Charles Crichton, a former cavalry officer and Old Etonian? Or Sayers’s husband? Or Eric Whelpton, travel writer and teacher (and who usually gets the part), whom she met in Oxford in 1918, when he was invalided from the Army, and for whom she felt an unreturned infatuation?

Back to “Boot” and Waugh

Malcolm started with “William Boot” fictionalised from Bill Deedes. He returns to Evelyn Waugh for the last of these fanciful flights: to “Sebastian Flyte”, indeed.

“Flyte” in Brideshead Revisited is, in part, Waugh’s Oxford contemporary and friend Alastair Graham: the original manuscript voccasionally Freudian-slips the name “Alastair” rather than “Sebastian”. Elements of Stephen Tennant (also “Cedric Hampton” for Nancy Mitford) were also included. Another model was Hugh Lygon, the second son of Earl Beauchamp. Lygon, also in Waugh’s Oxford set, had his home at Madresfield Court, Great Malvern, which provided another seed for the novel.

His (dis)Grace, the Duke

More interesting, perhaps, is the model for “Lord Marchmain”. William Lygon, Earl Beauchamp (image on right), was, to be generous, bisexual. This was retailed to George V by Beauchamp’s brother-in-law, Hugh Grosvenor, the Duke of Westminster (who inherited “a guinea a minute” from his rents, when he succeeded to the title in 1900: picture left).

Grosvenor (who, ironically, went by the nickname “Bendor”) had political motives besides personal spite: he was an extreme rightwinger (associated with the anti-semitic Right Club of the fascistic and Section 18B detainee, Captain Ramsay) and saw the “outing” of Beauchamp as a weapon against the Liberals. “Bendor” was also a sexual predator and serial adulterer, albeit respectably heterosexual in his tastes.

The King required Beauchamp to give up all his offices, and to retire abroad. Beauchamp’s son, Hugh (see above) talked his father out of killing himself. Westminster then ran to tell tales to Beauchamp’s wife, who had apparently no concept of homosexuality, and promptly went into a nervous collapse. Compounding the treachery, Westminster then had Scotland Yard take out a warrant for Beauchamp’s arrest, ensuring he could not return from exile in Venice. When Hugh died in 1936, the Home Secretary (Sir John Simon) showed a bit of humanity, had the warrant rescinded, so Beauchamp returned to Madresfield Court.

And finally?

Malcolm is fully aware that he did not, and cannot answer the headline question. Perhaps nobody felt the need to boast about the thing.

Instead, he notes that there is even speculation about the true identity of Malcolm himself.

1 Comment

Filed under Defoe, Delacroix, Doyle, Elgar, Forester, Gainsborough, Gallico, Goya, Haggard, Lawrence. Browning, Marryat, Shakespeare