Gracias, Dacre!

A bit of intropective retrospection

Malcolm’s lay-off, while he removed house, did serious damage to his small-but-perfectly formed readership here at Malcolm Redfellow’s Home Service.

So, Malcolm is particularly grateful to his few remaining and loyal recipients. That includes a certain Tory SPAD (or his dopplegänger) who regularly checks whether he’s again been the centre of attention. He hasn’t. He isn’t.

ampelmann1And, of course, there’s the constant flow of visitors revisiting Nena and her Luftballons. Now, that’s real Ostalgie.

Memo to Malcolm: surely time for another of those “Not so great and not so goods”. Number 29 on Joe “Spud” Murphy still draws in the odd passing punter.

Any-hoo (as they may say on Slugger O’Toole, and places North), the point today is a small vote of thanks to Paul Dacre and his Daily Mail.

It has fired Malcolm to new efforts, as you see.

For Malcolm was tiring of preaching to a small band of converts, with minimal response. The game was no longer worth the candle (interesting pre-electric light era metaphor, that).

Then Dacre went rogue on Miliband.

Suddenly an old post here, all the way back to mid-2009,  became flavour of the day. In large part, admittedly, because a couple of more interesting sites hot-linked to that post.

Malcolm suspects it was those telling Rothermere quotations on “patriotism” (and the Mail is all over “patriotism” this week). Statporn leaped by a factor of two or more. Thankin’ all of ye!

Meanwhile, in the Mancunian demimonde

When even the Torygraph‘s Political Editor (young Master Kirkup) is less-than-gushing about the almost-Beloved Leader, on this day of all days, one senses the Cameron speech was barely notches above the warmed-over left-over level:

Maybe he was tired: there were some uncharacteristic shadows under his eyes as he spoke. Maybe the Manchester hall isn’t the place for soaring oratory: ministers say Birmingham is a much better venue for acoustics and atmospherics. Or maybe his heart wasn’t in it: this is, after all, the “spare” year of a five-year Parliament. We’re still a fair way from the election, so it’s hardly surprising Mr Cameron privately regarded this as one of the less important Big Speeches of his career.

The audience seemed to sense it too: the response was dutiful, not ecstatic.

Kirkup wasn’t alone:

David Cameron’s speech sounded as tired as the Prime Minister looked. Apart from a hint towards depriving under-25s of benefit, there were no new policies. If the loyal audience in the hall was bored and underwhelmed, the apathetic public will be even more so. This was a wasted opportunity.

  • Ditto Gaby Hinsliff:


The Conservative party have just sent round a briefing note on the “everyone under 25 – earning or learning” proposal in David Cameron’s speech…

Normally I do not post briefing notes like this because they are long and detailed. This one is about as thin as they come.

UPDATE: A party source has stressed that there will be some exemptions. [Continued on page 94]

It takes a worried man to sing a worried song

By the by, that dental-grinding off-stage right must be the Tory ASMs. It makes one wonder what is the point.

Well, actually, the point is to trawl in those commercial and industrial sponsors who pay for the whole shebang, as , and James Kirkup explained a while back:

Lobbyists and other commercial visitors now almost outnumber grassroots Conservatives at conference.

Thirty-eight per cent of people attending the conference are party members, while 36 per cent are from commercial or charitable organisations.

The disclosure will add to fears that the party’s rank-and-file membership is collapsing, handing more power to a few wealthy financial backers and professional politicians.

That is your modern party politics.

Meanwhile, you spend all year trying to boost enthusiasm for Annual Conference; and Dacre allows the Leader of the Opposition to scrawl all over it, press-wise.

As for the Ally Campbell Death Star job on the unfortunate Jon Steafel, sit back and relish …

Death Star explodes


Leave a comment

Filed under advertising., BBC, blogging, Conservative Party policy., Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, David Cameron, Ed Miliband, films, Guardian, James Kirkup, Labour Party, politics, Private Eye, Tories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.