Category Archives: BBC

A plan so cunning, you could put a tail on it and call it a weasel!

That’s Blackadder, but everyone of sense knew so.

Yesterday, in The Observer, Andrew Rawnsley was also with the fauna:

Number 10 scheduled David Cameron’s supposedly “definitive” speech on immigration for the Friday just gone in the hope that this would draw a line under that argument, persuade his party to shut up about it and clear the way for the chancellor to swivel the nation’s focus on to the economy this Wednesday. Like many of Downing Street’s cunning schemes, it has not worked to plan. The media, having been encouraged to believe that the prime minister’s speech would be a “game-changer”, have reacted with a sense of anticlimax when he stepped back from advocating the new controls on EU migration that had floated out of Number 10 beforehand.

One blackly humorous Labour figure jokes: “The media management has been so cack-handed that, for a moment, I thought we’d done it.”

One has to agree that no all is going well with the once-impeccable Tory Fibs Factory.

I mean, consider what went up this morning:

Amble

There are three coded messages there:

  1. Keep right to Amble on with slow delivery;
  2. Danger!
  3. If you’re a Tory woman, you’ll always be out in the cold,  looking over a cold shoulder.

Leave a comment

Filed under Andrew Rawnsley, BBC, David Cameron, Observer

Antrim? Not baffled one wee bit.

Nick Robinson, thee BBC Political Editor, offers “last minute” thoughts:

If you live in Accrington or Aberystwyth or Antrim, wherever you are in England or Wales, or Northern Ireland, I can see why it might be a little bit baffling. Forgive me, it may even be a bit boring at times.

OK: the alliteration is a nice touch.

However, I could assure Mr Robinson that the folk in Antrim are not baffled one tiny bit. In Antrim — as in Down, Armagh and points adjacent — they know precisely which foot they dig with.

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Nick Robinson, Northern Irish politics

Overwhelmed by the sheer volume

Right, folks:

It has a smack of the true Banned List @JohnRentoul, which is turning into a style-guide for the ever-changing Zeitgeist (and there’s probably three examples in this sentence already).

I have already whinged over this one. Here it comes again:

Southern Water said “torrential rain fell across Sussex” leading to some sewers becoming “overwhelmed by the sheer volume of water”.

Like The L&N, the buck Don’t Stop Here Anymore

As, c’mon! You knew I couldn’t miss that Malcolmian aside.

Admit it:this one is better than the usual — 

Back in Sussex…

… the drains flooded.
As they do.
More often than not, excessive rainfall is involved.

The water companies can achieve the same result, failing to maintain their infrastructure (i.e. pipes and sewers), because shareholder dividends and managerial bonuses are a higher priority:

Southern Water has seen its operating profit increase 21.9 per cent on turnover of £778.7 million as it reports its financial results for the year ended 31 March 2013…

Profit after taxation for the company nearly doubled, up to £156.9 million from £79.9 million a year before.

While we find something else in the Portsmouth Evening News (9th October 2012):

According to the paper, Southern Water had been taken to court and prosecuted 40 times in the past nine years for pollution offences. Last year it was fined a total of £150,000 for sewage leaks and is one of the biggest polluters of rivers and beaches in the country.

Last year there were 47 leaks into Langstone harbour, an area which is a site of scientific interest and attracts many different species of migrating birds every year. Seals have also been known to use the harbour.

Southern Water made £79.9m profit after tax in the last financial year – more than double the profits the year before.

Sheer hypocrisy?

Another general benefit of privatisation is that, in any case, ministers are off-the-hook, for, like the Albertophage Wallace:

The Magistrate gave his o-pinion
That no-one was really to blame 
He said that he hoped the water-cump-nies
Would add further sums to their name.

Let us recall how, last winter, with the Somerset Levels drowned,  Environment Secretary Owen Paterson and his understrappers sloughed responsibility onto the Environment Agency.

When Chris Smith remarked that the government had cut £100 million for the budget, and ensured the sacking of a quarter of the workforce, and this might, just possibly, be a factor, he was instantly the embattled boss of the Environment Agency.

Sheer

This is another of those over-worked words. The OED has it as two different nouns, an adverb, an adjective, and four verbs. That’s before we go into derivatives and compounds, the choicest of which (for me) is:

Sheer Thursday: the Thursday in Holy Week, Maundy Thursday.

with allusion to the purification of the soul by confession (compare Shrove Thursday, French jeudi absolu), and perhaps also to the practice of washing the altars on that day.

Even then, I have to scroll down tho usage 8 of the adjective to find this one:

Neither more nor less than (what is expressed by the noun); that and nothing else; unmitigated, unqualified; downright, absolute, pure.

“Pure” is not what I’d be looking for, in the matter of flooded sewers or the Euston Road at rush-hour.

Despite the nine citations the OED finds (dated from 1583 to 1885), I’m unconvinced that the word adds anything— not even a useful reinforcement — in expressions like the sheer volume of water/traffic.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Conservative Party policy., folk music, Music, Oxford English Dictionary, politics, Tories.

Getting the boot

To celebrate the England football team’s performance at the World Cup, the BBC web-site has a feature by slang lexicographer Jonathon Green:

Mullered and 61 other words for beaten at sport

BoasWish I’d thought of it first.

The cliché has it that the Inuit have 52 words for “snow”. That originates from a 1911 book by Franz Boas. However, thecanadianencyclopedia.ca disputes this, and suggests a proper count is nearer just ten. Just as the Inuit may know the right (and wrong) types of snow, so the English should know precise terms for levels of defeat suffered in any sport which they claim to have invented.

I believe that the first international sporting fixture may well have been played at Leith in 1682. The Duke of York (later James II) and  John Paterstone represented Scotland against two English milords, and trounced them (trounce being the 63rd word Green should have found). SO the English sportsman should be inured to set-backs.

How to segue from that to the next thought?

Ummm …

Well, we might ponder on the English addiction to irony and self-mockery. It is, for sure, expiating our inner prejudices and guilts. Through the likes of George Macdonald Fraser’s magnificent gargoyle, Sir Harry Paget Flashman VC KCB KCIE. he was fun, and only as the joke soured did the political-correctors get in on the act (Fraser did a piece on just how this developed). By the same token, we have just had a small susurration about the sexism of the Samantha redouble-entendres in I’m Sorry I Haven’t a Clue (check some choice examples here).

51x7GmbKYFL._So, for the antidote to political correctness, in a sporting context, allow me to reintroduce you to Peter Tinniswood’s Brigadier, and the very first chapter in his first outing:

Root’s Boot

During the course of a long and arduous career in the service of King and country I have had the honour in the name of freedom and natural justice to slaughter and maim men (and women) of countless creeds and races.

Fuzzy wuzzies, Boers, Chinamen, Zulus, Pathans, Huns, Berbers, Turks, Japs, Gypos, Dagos, Wops and the odd Frog or two — all of them, no doubt, decent chaps ‘in their own way’.

Who is to say, for example, that the Fuzzy Wuzzies don’t have their equivalent don’t have their equivalent of our own dear John Inman and the delicious Delia Smith, mother of the two Essex cricketing cousins, Ray and Peter?

I have no doubt that the Dagos have their counterpart of our Anne Ziegler and Webster Booth, and I am perfectly certain that the Wops, just like us, have lady wives with hairy legs, loud voices and too many relations.

Indeed it is my firm opinion that all the victims of this carnage and slaughter were just like you and I — apart from their disgusting table manners and their revolting appearance.Poor chaps, they had only two failings – they were foreigners and they were on the wrong side.

Now as I approach the twilight of my life I look back with pleasure and with pride on those campaigns which have brought me so much comfort and fulfilment — crushing the Boers at Aboukir Bay, biffing the living daylights out of the Turk at the Battle of Rorke’s Drift, massacring the Aussies at The Oval in 1938.

But of all these battles one remains vividly in my mind to this very day — the Battle of Root’s Boot.

The incidents pertaining to this conflict occurred in 1914 during the MCC’s first and only tour to the Belgian Congo.

Who on earth had the crass stupidity to give the Congo to the Belgians in the first place is quite beyond me.

I am bound to say that I consider the Belgians to be the most revolting shower of people ever to tread God’s earth.

Eaters of horse flesh, they let us down in two world wars. They’re hopeless at golf. They drive on the wrong side of the road, and they’re forever yodelling about their blasted fiords and their loathsome fretwork egg-timers.

Is it any wonder they made such a confounded mess of running the Congo?

When we went there in 1914, there was not one decent wicket the length and breadth of the country, and the facilities for nets were totally inadequate.

And, if that weren’t enough, during our matches there were at least two outbreaks of cannibalism among spectators, which I found totally unacceptable, and which I am convinced were responsible for the loss of our most promising young leg spinner, M.M. Rudman-
Stott.

He was sent out to field at deep third man in the match against an Arab Slavers’ Country Eleven, and all we found of him after the tea interval was the peak of his Harlequins cap and half an indelible pencil.

But of these setbacks we were blissfully unaware as in high good spirits we set off from Liverpool in April 1914 aboard the steamship, SS Duleepsinjhi.

The party was skippered by the Rev. Thurston Salthouse-Bryden, a former chaplain to Madame Tussauds and a forceful if erratic opening bat who distinguished himself in 1927 playing for the Convocation of Canterbury by scoring a century before matins in the match against a Coptic Martyrs Eleven.

TyldesleyI had the honour to be vice captain and OC ablutions, and among the notable players in our midst were the Staffordshire opening bowler, Thunderton-Cartwright, who was later to become rugby league correspondent for The Lancet, and the number three bat and occasional seamer, Ashton, F., who was later responsible for the choreography of the Royal Ballet’s highly acclaimed production of Wisden’s Almanack, 1929, featuring Alicia Markova as Ernest Tyldesley.

Of all the players in the party, though, the one who made the profoundest impression on all who met him (and some who didn’t) was the all-rounder, Arthur Root, a distant cousin of the Derbyshire, Worcestershire and England player, Fred Root, of the same name.

Root was what we in the ‘summer game’ call ‘a natural’.

During the voyage he kept us constantly entertained with his reading in Derbyshire dialect of the works of Colette, and his rendition on spoons and stirrup pumps of the later tone poems of Frederick Delius.

Root had charm, wit, erudition and the largest pair of feet it has ever been my privilege to encounter.

Indeed on the outward voyage they were directly responsible for saving the life of a Goanese steward who fell overboard seven nautical miles sou’ sou’ east of Ushant.

The poor wretch was applying linseed oil to the Rev. Salthouse-Bryden’s self-righting lectern when a freak giant wave washed him overboard.

With the lifebelts being in use for a rumbustious game of deck quoits, Root with great presence of mind threw the only object available to him into the sea — to wit, his right boot.

The dusky Indian steward clambered into the pedicular container and was instantly hauled aboard by the boot laces.

Little did we realize then how vital that boot was to be to our safety and well-being many many months later.

We disembarked without incident at Matadi and set off forthwith for the interior.

What a noble sight our native bearers made as they trudged along the primitive jungle trails carrying on their woolly heads the essential paraphernalia of our expedition — sight screens, portable scorebox and heavy roller.

The capital city, Leopoldvilie, was reached in three weeks.

How strange it was to our English eyes — no tram conductors, no Bedlington terriers, no Ordnance Survey bench marks.

Our only consolation came when Root discovered the local branch of Gunn and Moore’s where we bought leopard-skin cricket bags, scorebooks bound in genuine okapi hide, and the Rev. Salthouse-Bryden purchased an object warranted as a Bantu baptismal love token, but which to my untutored eyes looked more like H. M. Stanley’s left testicle.

We won each of our four matches in Leopoldville by an innings and ‘a substantial margin’, the Belgians ground fielding, as we had anticipated, being of a typically abysmal level.

A nation of congenital butterfingers, the Belgians.

We then set out for what was to be the most difficult and dangerous opposition of our entire tour — three unofficial Test matches against the Pygmies.

We left Leopoldville on a sultry August morning and did not reach our destination until late November 1914.
During the long and onerous trek we had the misfortune to lose three members of our party:

Evans-Pritchard, E. E.: stung by scorpion.

Leakey, L. S. B.: trampled by buffalo.

Attenborough, D.: retired hurt.

It was a nuisance to lose two wicket-keepers and a ‘more than adequate’ middle order batsman in that fashion, but nonetheless our party was in good spirits, when we arrived at Potto Potto to be greeted by officials of the Pygmy Board of Cricket Control.

The chairman, a gnarled, wizened little creature, who, incidentally, bore a marked resemblance to the distinguished light comedy actor and chanteuse, Mr John Inman, made us most welcome, offering us victuals and a choice of his most beautiful wives.

‘Just like playing for Derby against Notts at Worksop,’ said Root, and one and all joined in his hearty and innocent laughter.

On the advice of the Rev. Salthouse-Bryden we declined the feminine offerings but accepted the victuals which were served in the great adobe, thatched pavilion by elderly matrons of the tribe.

It was during the subsequent revelries that the first hitch in the proceedings occurred.
By prior arrangement we were to provide the balls to be used in the match, and, as a matter of courtesy, our baggage master, Swanton, presented a box of same to be examined by the Pygmy officials.

Imagine our horror when the minute, dark-skinned fraternity passed the balls from hand to hand, sniffed them, shook them and, with expressions of sublime delight, ate them.

Worse was to follow when the severely truncated tinted gents offered us the balls they wished to use — row upon row of small spherical objects, gnarled, matted, wrinkled and pitted.

For a moment we gazed at them in stunned silence.

Then the Rev. Salthouse-Bryden exclaimed:

‘Saints preserve us — they are shrunken heads.’

What could have been the very severest of fraught situations was saved by our ever-genial giant, Root.

Picking up one of the heads in his massive fist, he examined it briefly and then said:
‘Don’t worry, skipper. We’ll use this ‘un. It should be just right for seaming after lunch.’

The day of the first unofficial test dawned bright and clear.

The Pygmies won the toss and elected to bat.

PillingThe two Pygmy openers made their way to the wicket to the accompaniment of the howling of monkeys and the screeching of gaudily feathered parakeets, and as I watched them take the crease from my vantage point at deep extra cover, it was for all the world like looking through the wrong end of a pair of binoculars at a dusky wee George Wood and an extremely sunburned Mr Harry Pilling.

Our opening bowler, Thunderton-Cartwright, came bounding to the wicket to deliver the first ball of this historic match.

It whistled from his hand at ferocious pace.

But all to no avail.

On the puddingy and unresponsive pitch the ball thudded mutely into the turf and rose no more than six inches from the ground.

‘Bouncer,’ yelled the Pygmy opener.

It was a cry taken up in unison by the masses of minuscule spectators packed in dense masses in what was, I believe, their equivalent of the Warner Stand.

An ugly incident seemed certain to ensue.

But at that moment, totally unexpected, came the crackle of small arms fire, and across the distant river burst a column of native Askaris.

As the Askaris waded across the river, firing indiscriminately from the hip, the Pygmies fled as if by magic.

As bullets whistled past our ears we flung ourselves to the ground, only to hear the following words which plunged an icy dagger to the depths of our hearts.

‘On your feet, Englische Schweinhunds!’

We looked up to see three white men, dressed in khaki drill, with shaven heads and leering duelling scars upon their cheeks.

‘Huns,’ we cried in unison.

Indeed they were.

Why hadn’t MCC informed us that war had been declared?

Why hadn’t the Test and County Cricket Board notified us that marauding parties of German colonial troops were rampaging through the territory?

Why was there no news in The Cricketer of the conflagration that was to rewrite the map of Europe and suspend for four years all Test matches between England and Australia?

Such thoughts flashed through my mind as we were bound by the straps of our cricket pads to the portable scoreboard, and the Askaris lined themselves in front of us in firing squad formation.

It was then, as death stared us in the face, that we were addressed by our skipper, the Rev. Salthouse-Brvden.

‘Oh, Lord,’ he said. Thou hast in Thy wisdom decreed that our innings shall be closed.

‘It is pleasing to Thine eye that in that great score-book in the sky it shall be written of our party, “Death stopped play”.

‘So, Lord, give us the strength to face the long walk back the celestial pavilion like men and members of the MCC, or whichever is more appropriate.’

It was at that moment that I noticed that Root was improperly dressed for the occasion.

His right boot was missing.

Before I could speak he motioned with his eyes towards the distant river.

An amazing sight met my eyes.

Floating silently in the current was a large right cricket boot.

And in it, paddling silently, was a war party of our erstwhile Pygmy opponents.

The Huns and Askaris, totally unaware of the approaching sporting footwear, paused to gloat over their triumph.

It waas to be their undoing, for in an instant the boot touched the river bank, the Pygmies sprang out through the lace holes and, screaming like dervishes, unloosed their poisoned arrows against them.

It was all over in seconds.

The Askaris and their vile Teutonic masters lay dead at our feet.

The match was resumed the following morning.

We had the good fortune to win, when Root took the last three Pygmy wickets with the last three balls of the match.

Years later he was to maintain that this was only possible owing to the slight inconsistency in the second new ball, which caused him to produce prodigious variations in swing and bounce.

And with a smile and a gentle nod of his genial head he would say:

‘I reckon it were the duelling scar in the seam what done it.’

 That may require foot-notes for the younger fellows.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Britain, cricket, George MacDonald Fraser, Guardian, prejudice, Racists, reading

A fair shake of the sauce bottle

Jon Donnison, the BBC’s Sydney correspondent, celebrates the rise and deplores the fall of Australian slang.

And quite proper, too.

He notes why the phenomenon came about:

Barry at the Psych“Australian slang really seems to have built up a head of steam in the late 19th Century,” says Tony Thorne, linguist at Cambridge University and author of the Dictionary of Contemporary Slang.

This was partly down to the fact that the kind of people who went to Australia, tended to come from places with rich local linguistic traditions like Scotland, Ireland and the East End of London, he says.

“Those people weren’t hampered by the upper-class cultures of the UK. They were much more free to play with language, creating nicknames for local things, in a way that the buttoned-up Brits in those days weren’t able to do.”

There is also, of course, the link with convicts and the British policy of setting up penal colonies in Australia.

Hmm: “upper-class cultures of the UK” inhibited the development of “nicknames for local things”. Anyone who has experienced English public-school traditions, would doubt that.

Donnison also acknowledges:

But the glory days of Australian slang really arrived in the 1960s and 1970s.

“That was the time when Australianisms stopped being something local and started to spread outside of Australia itself,” says Thorne.

Television played a big part in that, in his view, and in particular one man – Barry Humphries.

“Hello possums!” was screeched out on TV screens around the world from the mauve-rinsed, horn-rimmed-spectacled Dame Edna Everage, Humphries’ most famous character.

It was another Humphries creation though, Bazza McKenzie, who ticked all the linguistic boxes of the Australian stereotype.

Barrington Bradman Bing McKenzie, to give him his full name, was the hard-drinking, straight-talking Aussie Abroad, first introduced in comic-strip form in the British satirical magazine, Private Eye, and later the star of films The Adventures of Barry McKenzie and Barry McKenzie Holds His Own.

Ah, yes! It feels like only yesterday!

Barry

 

For a full decade, starting around the time the Americans didn’t quite get the Stones version of It’s All Over Now, the fortnightly doings of Bazza in and around Kangaroo Valley were essential study.

From which we can draw three corollaries:

  • We needed the stereotype of that baggy-strided, wide-hatted Boy from the Bush (whom Peter Cook reckoned “an Australian Candide”) to reconcile us to the self-confident swarm of Antipodean dentists and bar-hands, who arrived O[ver].S[eas].
  • We recognised that this was all a construct: we’re not that many kangaroos loose in the top paddock to be within cooee of confusing myth and reality. The Barry of the cartoon-strip was an outrageous grotesque. We loved him for it.
  • We adopted, ironically — but, of course, his infinite variety of expressions: straining the potatoes, having a snakes, flogging the lizard, splashing the boots, writing yer name on the lawn, pointing Percy at the porcelain, shaking hands with the wife’s best friend, and all the others that Barry Humphries’ fertile imagination concocted.

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Private Eye, Quotations

Sounds daft to me

_74612098_scanialorriesplatooningNote the copyright on that image. It’s softening-up promotion.

Apparently “platooning” — a “road train” (we used to call that a “convoy”, but that’s too militaristic, whereas “platooning” is a nice neologism) of heavy lorries controlled by wifi — is the:

‘Greener’ freight key to more sustainable global trade

 Never was a BBC website headline so heavy with PR-inspired froth.

Do I trust my fixed home wifi? Is it reliable 7/24/365.25? Am I happy with serial behemoths (each one with 730+ horsepower aboard) thundering down the road, depending on a mobile arrangement of the same, open to umpteen forms of interference and mayhem? What could possible go wrong?

[Actually, were I a small-time terrorist, I’d be building an interferometer.]

Put it as simply as possible: would any UK Transport ministers sign off such a disaster-bound-to-happen?

[Oddly enough, I say:

So, we have motorways choked with these parades of diesel-spouting monsters, either choked up in a tail-back, or barrelling on at a steady 70 mph (or more), all at some unfeasibly-small separation front-to-back, to avoid “aerodynamic drag resistance” and save “15% fuel”.

Or …

… here’s an alternative, four times more fuel efficient than anything that can be done with a truck —

Use the railways for long distance.

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Tories., travel

Dien Bien Phu — what a scorcher

The BBC website is renovating an old ‘un (one, to be honest, I my memory had mislaid):

Dien Bien Phu: Did the US offer France an A-bomb?

Sixty years ago this week, French troops were defeated by Vietnamese forces at Dien Bien Phu. As historian Julian Jackson explains, it was a turning point in the history of both nations, and in the Cold War – and a battle where some in the US appear to have contemplated the use of nuclear weapons.

“Would you like two atomic bombs?” These are the words that a senior French diplomat remembered US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles asking the French Foreign Minister, Georges Bidault, in April 1954. The context of this extraordinary offer was the critical plight of the French army fighting the nationalist forces of Ho Chi Minh at Dien Bien Phu in the highlands of north-west Vietnam.

Note that weaselly “appear to have contemplated”.

Those were indeed stirring times and high tension, and not ones any sane person would wish to repeat. For a few examples:

  • In February 1953, Eisenhower had ended the blockade of Formosa, in effect giving the Nationalists free rein to attack the mainland.
  • The French were involved in major colonial wars, not all of which were in Indo China.
  • Stalin died (5 March 1953), creating doubts about the future direction of the Soviet Union. The US made noises about freedom for the Soviet-bloc countries. In July there were strikes and riots in East Germany which were suppressed by military force — whereupon the US made clear there would be no support or intervention.
  • The Korean War was still recent: the Armistice had been signed on 27 July 1953.
  • The Soviet Union was already a thermo-nuclear power, detonating its first H-bomb on 12 August 1953.
  • In September 1953 the US brought Franco’s Spain into the Western defence net (but not NATO) with $226M in exchange for military bases.

 Dien Bien Phu: the context

Quite what brainstorm possessed  the French commander General Henri Navarre to create a garrison (November 1953) in the quagmire of this enclosed valley must be one of the psychological mysteries of military history. On paper it might have been a logical link between the French base at Sam Neua in Laos and the garrison at Lai Chau in Northern Vietnam. Then again the opium production around Dien Bien Phu financed Vietminh’s weapon purchases. Talks about peace talks were happening back at Geneva; but Ho Chi Minh was anxious for a symbolic victory to hurry things along.

One of Navarre’s assumptions was this would be tank country. Ten Chaffee M24 tanks were flown in. It was quickly realised they could not cope with the undergrowth. Once the rains set in, they became bogged down.

So the siege came down to an artillery battle. The French had, again on paper, ample resources: some 30 heavy howitzers and as many heavy mortars. Alas, the Vietminh had backpacked into the surrounding hills far more weaponry:  unknown to the French, Võ Nguyên Giáp had five infantry divisions, 140 field howitzers, 50 heavy mortars, perhaps 80 recoilless guns, 36 anti-aircraft guns, and a dozen Katyusha rocket launchers camouflaged in the wooded hillsides.

The shooting war began in earnest on 12th March. French attrition was horrific (a  final butcher’s bill of 7,693 French — though at a cost of 20-odd thousand Vietminh). Beatrice (the French so romantically gave their strong-points girly identifiers) was smashed within a day. The airstrip had been put out of use within three days: the second artillery post, Gabrielle, was useless by the same time. That left Isabelle, which proved to be poorly located and incapable of offering covering fire. Colonel Charles Piroth, in command of the French heavy gunnery, took to his cot on the morning of 15th March, cradling a grenade, and pulled the pin.

In total Vietminh AA guns destroyed 56 French aircraft, and damaged 150-odd more.

The American dilemma

Paul Ely, the French chief of staff, had come hot-foot to Washington as soon as the shooting started, looking for American military assistance. He found John Foster Dulles as Secretary of State, and Admiral Arthur Radford as chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receptive. Vice-Pres Nixon, no cooing dove, had a walk-on part (but Eisenhower had his number, and never allowed him near big decisions).

General Ely returned to Paris with a plan, Operation Vulture, which would involve B-29 bombers out of the Philippines, escorted by US Seventh Fleet fighters,  carving mayhem out of the Vietminh attackers. General Matthew Twining, for the USAAF, was up for it. The objector was General Matthew Ridgeway of the army, who had commanded the Allies in Korea, Ridgeway reckoned, even if nukes were used, it would require seven divisions to hold the line in IndoChina, and another five if the Chinese intervened. This was the wrong war in the wrong place. Eisenhower squelched Operation Vulture by insisting it would only go ahead if it were approved by Congress and supported by Britain.

KarnowThis  from Stanley Karnow, Vietnam, a History:

A Pentagon study group at the time concluded that three tactical atomic weapons, “properly employed,” would suffice to smash the Vietminh forces at Dienbienphu. The idea tantalized Radford, who favored its proposal to the French. But the notion alarmed senior State Department officials, one of whom warned that, if the French were approached, “the story would certainly leak” and spark “a great hue and cry throughout the parliaments of the free world.” Georges Bidault disclosed some months later that he had turned down an offer by Dulles for atomic weapons during talks the previous April. Dulles denied the account, and the French confirmed his denial, saying that Bidault had been “jittery” and “overwrought” and had misunderstood. Bidault nevertheless repeated the account in his memoirs.

Contrary to portrayals that depict him as an unalloyed “dove,” Eisenhower did not completely oppose U.S. intervention. But recalling his command of the allies during World War II, he refused to commit America alone. “Without allies and associates,” he told his staff at one meeting, “the leader is just an adventurer, like Genghis Khan.” Besides, he had been elected on a pledge to end the war in Korea, which might have spiraled into a bigger confrontation with China—and as his closest aide, Sherman Adams, observed, “Having avoided one total war with Red China the year before in Korea, when he had United Nations support, he was in no mood to provoke another one in Indochina . . . without the British and other Western allies.” Eisenhower appealed to Prime Minister Churchill to participate, reminding him of the failure to stop Hitler “by not acting in unit and in time.” He sent Dulles to London to plead his case, but the British spurned him. Churchill told the House of Commons that Britain “was not prepared to give any undertakings … in Indochina in advance of the results of Geneva,” and Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden, who was to cochair the conference with Vyacheslav Molotov, Soviet foreign minister, simply refused to be “hustled into injudicious military decisions.” The best that Dulles could achieve was a British promise to contemplate a future regional security arrangement, which eventually became the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization.

It was clear by late April, as the battle raged at Dienbienphu, that neither the Americans nor anyone else would come to the rescue of the French. During our chat in Hanoi thirty-six years later, I asked Giap to reflect on what might have happened had Eisenhower intervened. “No doubt we would have had problems,” he replied, “but the outcome would have been the same. The battlefield was too big for effective bombing. Only a lunatic would have resorted to atomic weapons, which in any case would have devastated the French troops. At the time, however, I feared poison gas. Fortunately, it was never used.”

Confronted by the inevitable, the Washington hierarchy now accepted the imminent French defeat with genuine or contrived equanimity. Dulles tried to portray the coming debacle as a blessing, saying that it would arouse the other countries of Southeast Asia to take “measures that we hope will be sufficiently timely and vigorous to preserve [them] from Communist domination.” Eisenhower, appearing as calm as ever, shrugged off what had not long before loomed as a crisis. Speaking at a press conference on April 29, he said, “You certainly cannot hope at the present state of our relations in the world for a completely satisfactory answer with the Communists. The most you can work out is a practical way of getting along.”

Giap’s timing was perfect. On the afternoon of May 7, 1954, the red Vietminh flag went up over the French command bunker at Dienbienphu. The next morning in Geneva, nine delegations assembled around a horseshoe-shaped table at the old League of Nations building to open discussions aimed at ending the war in Indochina.

Karnow published in 1983. My copy, Revised and Updated, 1991, is from 1994. Twenty years further on, the BBC and Professor Julian Jackson have rediscovered the story of the Vietnamese nukes.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Eisenhower, Franco, History

I’ve Got a Ferridge Sticking up My Nose

Dylan Thomas and Julie Andrews both thought we should Begin at the Very Beginning. Except this particular whimsical notion has several epiphanies.

booksThe earliest is the story (no, I wasn’t there to assert it personally) that what did for “Hail Oswald” Mosley and his Black Shorts Shirts was the moment The Great Leader would raise his arm in a fascist salute and a schoolmasterly voice from the back of the hall would call: “Yes, Oswald, you may leave the room!”

The Fortunes of Nigel

[As I keep saying, Walter Scott is long-winded, but could spin a decent tale. That is not worth developing here as a full-blown aside. We’ll have one of those in a moment.]

Since abuse is not seeming to damage Teflon Nigel, let’s try similar mockery. Mrs Angry, she of the magnificent Broken Barnet site, reckons:

… it would be interesting to look at Farage’s own background.

He likes to spin the story behind his own unusual surname as being of Huguenot origin: sort of foreign, yes, a bit French but you know, way back, and Protestant. None of that foreign Papist nonsense. 


In fact a quick look on Ancestry.co.uk reveals that the Farage name, to be pronounced, we are told, Far-AGE, is more likely to be rather more boring Ferridge, from the home counties, generations back. 

Mrs Angry then shows that Mr Ferridge not only has a German secretary/helpmeet/back-of the fridge-cleaning wife, he had a German refugee great-grandmother, Bina Schrod.

Then, yesterday, we had John Rentoul’s General Election countdown (which provoked my earlier post).  Mr Rentoul is very anxious we understand:

Rentoul_tweet

Then compounds his apology by reusing the same image in a later tweet.

Mr Ferridge has a very polecatty snarl, there.

Which brought me to another recollection, and one at which I was present, by the marvel of radio: John Cleese and Graham Chapman’s The Ferret Song.

A Malcolmian aside

There is something of a small family spat going on here, as to which show this originated in. The dissent  is the source of the Ur-version. Was it:

  • I’m Sorry, I’ll Read That Again (BBC Home Service, 1964 and continuing), which is the one I’m sticking with, and why I say its “off the wireless”.
  • At Last the 1948 Show (ITV, 1967)

or even:

  • Monty Python

My final concession would be all three, but in that order.

Anyway, back to sanity, and:

Got it? If you have, you’ll never forget it.and one piece of decent classical music is ruined for ever.

So, all together, the massed Ferridge Chorale’s premiere performance, guaranteed to disrupt any UKIP event:

[Solo] I’ve got a Ferridge sticking up my nose …
[Chorus] He’s got a Ferridge sticking up his nose!
[Solo] How he got there I can’t tell,
But now he’s there he grates like hell …

[Vamp till irate Kipper thugs intervene.]

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, Independent, John Rentoul, politics, UKIP, Walter Scott

Morning joy

A delightful mini-interview (actually three minutes direct to camera) with Bob Mankoff.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26893127

Who he?

The great arbiter of the funnies in the New Yorker, that’s who.

He looks the part of “the cartoon editor of the New Yorker”.

He talks the part. This, fellow Brits, is the epitome of the smart Noo York dude.

His gestures are superb, theatrical and pointed.

To cap it all, “I had a complicated relationship with my mother”.

A consistent tradition

mTv3Yhtk-N7huz2n0f4pjvAThe true joy is Mankoff’s collection of New Yorker cartoons, first published for the magazine’s 80th anniversary (and more recently up-dated). By no coincidence, the accompanying double CD — which had the entire oeuvre of 68,647 images — seems to have been ‘borowed’.

The punchiness of too many remains painfully true — what Mankoff calls “the right amount of wrong”. There is, for a prime example, this one by Al Frueh, from that dismal year 1932:

Frueh 1932

I have never quite got the fascination with Thurberesque seals (an Algonquin in-joke?). That apart, many of these simple drawings are appealing, simple and have hidden depths. Here, for example, is an Alan Dunn from May 1946:

Alan Dunn May 46

It implies much the same as Norman Rockwell’s Willie Gillis in College [which I think is a magnificent concoction], the Saturday Evening Post front cover spread later that year:

Wiilie Gillis at college

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, New York City, New Yorker, Norman Rockwell

The Great Rat-wagon contest

Long-gone days of school summer holidays involved trucking young daughters to camp-sites in the south of France. It was necessary to invent diversions, competitions and games to keep them occupied in the longueurs of the driving.

Piggling

This was aeons before Jeremy Clarkson and co. started picking on them.

What was required was to spot a caravan, cry “Piggle!” A more sophisticated version required the counting of the number of vehicles trapped behind the obstruction: longest queue wins that day’s round.

This was the “I am the snail. You are the slime” challenge.

Naming bridges

Each motorway bridge deserves a name.

Spot a bridge. Give it an appropriate title. Marks awarded, as in ice-dancing, diving and similar non-sports, for style and interpretation.

Unknown-1Mister/Monsieur/Mein Herr Blob

This, in more egalitarian and sympathetic days, would be considered offensive and discriminatory.

Spot an obese, over-extended belly. Claim him as the parochial, provincial, regional or national champion.

And the best game of the lot …

Rat-wagons

In those days French and Belgian roads featured large numbers of those strange corrugated-sided vans. Many were Peugeots, but the prime specimens were — without question — aged Citroen H vans.

Since the Type H was produced over three-and-a-half decades (1947-1981) and there were going on half-a-million of them, some still in daily use, some reduced to hen-huts, there was a wealth of material to abuse and mock.

A rat-wagon is identifiable by:

  • its lack of speed (though alternative, imaginative, non-mobile uses were regarded as a bonus);
  • its obstructiveness; and — above all —
  • by advanced decay and rust.

The ultimate all-time winner was spotted being used as a road-side fish-stall in Versailles: it clearly hadn’t shifted in years, and probably never again could, without dissolving into a heap of iron oxide.

So, this morning the Pert Young Piece recalls the fun, with a photo from her iPhone, taken in Park Road, Hornsey:

photo

Her caption is:

Needs more rust

Leave a comment

Filed under BBC, leisure travel